Sistemas nacionales de clasificación de revistas científicas en América Latina: tendencias recientes e implicaciones para la evaluación académica en ciencias sociales

Resumen

Academic researchers are subject to multiple evaluation instances to assess the quality and impact of their scientific production. Based on bibliometric indicators and indexing services, national science and technology councils have issued guidelines for classifying journals. This paper compares the guidelines implemented in Argentina, Mexico and Colombia. The authors conclude that recent trends in Mexico and Co­lombia point to a deepening of an orthodox model of scientific evaluation. In contrast, Ar­gentina has developed a more critical position regarding the relevance of bibliometric indi­cators in the social sciences. However, none of these countries seems to be opting for inno­vative forms of evaluation linked to open and collaborative science.